Legal Opinion
City of Albuquerque v. Soto Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2017No. 16-2065PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.. The district court remanded this case after concluding that the defendant had waived its right to remove by filing a motion to dismiss in state court. We hold that we have appellate jurisdiction over this appeal, and affirm. 1
BACKGROUND
The City of Albuquerque (“the City”) provides public-bus services to Albuquerque residents. As part of those services, the City charges a fare payable by cash or coin. The City hired Soto Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Miracle Delivery Armored Services (“Soto”) to count the fare money, transport it by armored car to the City’s bank for…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Kris Kenny v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Estate of Cummings Ex Rel. Montoya v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Gallegos v. Bernalillo County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Abraham Watkins v. FesterygaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.