Legal Opinion
Steele v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 29, 2003No. 02-1492PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
A provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) directs that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions” until a prisoner exhausts his available administrative remedies. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (amended by Pub.L. 104-134, Title I, § 101(a), 110 Stat. 1321-71 (1996)). In this case, the district court dismissed the lost-property claims of plaintiff Victor Steele, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm the judgment of the district court and, in doing so, resolve several…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Bobby Ford v. Donald JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.