O'HARA v. Board of Parole
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAIjMER, j .
This administrative case raises a small but important issue respecting the procedures by which a party before an administrative agency can obtain witnesses to testify on his behalf. The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) denied petitioner Thomas O’Hara’s request to present the testimony of eyewitnesses at a hearing on charges that he had violated the conditions of his post-prison supervision, concluding that the testimony would not be relevant. The board found that petitioner had violated the conditions and imposed a sanction of 45 days in jail. The Court of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Clay v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3Cited by11 opinions
- Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Murphy v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.