Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PRATT, District Judge.
This is an action by four plaintiffs in the automobile repair business against five automobile insurance companies and two companies in the business of adjusting damage claims. Plaintiffs charge defendants with violations of the Federal antitrust laws and, more specifically, with conspiracy to fix prices, in allegedly agreeing to pay only the prevailing rates for labor and parts in the adjustment of the damage claims of defendants’ insureds or on their behalf.
While several other motions are pending, this Memorandum concerns only the two motions for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- The Travelers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- California League of Independent Insurance Producers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- David M. Barry, M.D. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Phillip M. Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company and State Farm Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Phillip M. Proctor, D/B/A Proctor Auto Service v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Royal Drug Co. v. Group Life & Health InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.