Legal Opinion
Derensis v. Coopers & Lybrand Chartered Accountants
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 12, 1996No. Civ. 94-4202 (WGB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASSLER, District Judge:
Defendant Coopers and Lybrand Chartered Accountants (“Coopers”) moves to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens. Defendants Alan C. Campney and Caspar Koch join in Coopers’ motion and also move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. This court’s jurisdiction is pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78aa and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1337. For the following reasons, defendants’ motions to dismiss are DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This consolidated class action arises out of International Nesmont Industrial Corporation’s (“Nesmont”) filing of allegedly…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Livent, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re Campbell Soup Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- In Re MobileMedia Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.