Legal Opinion
DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 8, 2000No. Docket Nos. 99-7776, 99-7825PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Philip Services Corporation (Philip), a Canadian metal processing company, is alleged in the complaint in the instant action to have perpetrated a massive fraud upon its shareholders, the vast majority of whom are U.S. investors. Philip decided about eight years ago to become a dominant player in the metal recovery and processing industry in the United States. To that end during the period 1992-97 it purchased 15 American companies and maintained facilities in 12 states. Its American efforts thereafter generated 70 percent of its corporate revenue. To raise money to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Iragorri v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Miller Features Syndicate, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Reliance Insurance v. Six Star, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.