Legal Opinion
In Re Livent, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1999No. 98 Civ. 5686 (RWS)PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Garth A. Drabinsky (“Dra-binsky”), Myron Gottlieb (“Gottlieb”), Robert Topol (“Topol”), Maria M. Messina (“Messina”), H. Garfield Emerson (“Emerson”), Martin Goldfarb (“Goldfarb”), A. Alfred Taubman (“Taubman”), 1 and De-loitte & Touche Canada (“D & T”), have moved to dismiss this action, pursuant to Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to plead scienter and fraud with sufficient particularity. Additionally, Drabinsky, Gottlieb, Topol, Messina, and D & T move to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens. Drabinsky and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litig.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.