Legal Opinion

Daniel L. Berglund, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 2016No. A15-957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

This‘case comes to us after thfe tax court denied an appeal in which relator Daniel L. Berglund challenged the validity of returns that the Commissioner of Revenue prepared and filed on his behalf. Berg-lund’s challenge asserted that the commissioner-filed returns were invalid because the Commissioner did not sign them as •required' by Minn. R. >8160.0620 (2015). Because the relevant statutes do not re quire that the Commissioner sign commissioner-filed returns in order for those returns to be valid, we affirm.

On May 12, 2014, the Minnesota Depart ment of Revenué…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Huff v. DeKalb County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. McGavock v. City of Water ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. Billion v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Northern States Power Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bremer Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. MatejcekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Appeal of KrenikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Halvorson v. B&F Fastener SupplySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. In the Matter of the Wetland Conservation Act appeal filed by David Stock of a Restoration Order located in part of ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API