Legal Opinion

Appeal of Krenik

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 2017No. A15-1566Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

The City of Saint Paul issued an abatement order requiring appellant John Kre-nik to comply with Minn. Stat. § 16810, subd. le (2016), which requires collector vehicles to be “screened from ordinary public view.” Krenik had covered his collector vehicles with tarps and later constructed a portable fence across the front of the area ■ where he -parked the tarped vehicles, but the vehicles were still partially visible from public areas. The Saint Paul City Council upheld -the abatement order, concluding that the tarps and fence did not satisfy the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API