Mahoning Valley Bread Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, a sum due it for bread furnished to a man named Corbi. The whole matter resolves itself into the question whether Corbi was the agent of the company either directly authorized to contract on its behalf or given such apparent authority as would justify one dealing with him to regard him as the agent of the company. The facts are as follows: the company was repairing its tracks and had gangs of men doing the work. These men slept in cars furnished by the company and the company paid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fee v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Hileman v. FalckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Dodge v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Grim v. BonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- T. L. Smith Co. v. Burd P. Evans & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Culbertson v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Bunting v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Yubas v. MakranskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Van Pelt v. SpotzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Wesley Et Ux. v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.