Legal Opinion

Wesley Et Ux. v. Rhodes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1934No. Appeal 193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Staoteeld, J.,

This is an action of trespass for malicious prosecution based upon the ¡wrongful arrest of the plaintiffs on two criminal charges: (1) the larceny of a diamond ring, and (2) for receiving stolen goods.

The defendant, J. C. Rhodes, at the times complained of, owned and operated a jewelry store at Homestead, Allegheny County. This store was, during defendant’s absence, in charge of and managed by defendant’s son, J. M. Rhodes. In 1930 one Harry Amsler bought at defendant’s store from the latter’s son, a diamond ring for the price of $175 on a bailment lease contract. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hileman v. FalckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Mahoning Valley Bread Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Renfro v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Nunamaker v. New Alexandria Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API