Legal Opinion

Yubas v. Makransky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1930No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Walling,

Joseph Galanter and M. M. Waxman, being engaged in the real estate business as a corporation under the name of Galanter-Waxman, Inc., on March 16, 1926, obtained a loan of $7,500 from the Union National Bank of Philadelphia, for which they gave a promissory note payable in four months, executed by the corporation as maker and endorsed by Leon R. Yubas and Simon Makransky, the former being the father-in-law of Galanter and the latter the father-in-law of Waxman. The evidence tended to show that the understanding of the endorsers was that they should share equally…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Barnett v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  3. Bensinger v. WrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Long v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Jordan v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Havasy v. ResnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. DeFrancesco v. Western Pennsylvania Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Durkin v. Equine Clinics, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API