Legal Opinion
St. Croix Development, LLC v. Gossman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 19, 2007No. A06-1879PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Appellants Mark David Gossman, et al. (collectively, Gossman), 1 filed an application to discharge a notice of lis pendens on Mark Gossman’s residence. The district court denied the application, and Gossman appealed. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal, holding that the denial of an application to discharge a notice of lis pen-dens is not immediately appealable. We granted Gossman’s petition for review and, for the reasons discussed below, affirm.
Respondents St. Croix Development, LLC, and Montari Homes, Inc. (collectively, St. Croix), employed Mark Gossman until…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008