Legal Opinion

Wegbreit v. Marley Orchards Corp.

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided May 11, 1992No. CS-91-191-FVSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REINSTATE § 10(b) CLAIMS

VAN SICKLE, District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reinstate § 10(b) Claims (Ct. Rec. 63). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

A. BACKGROUND

Marley Orchards Income Fund I Limited Partnership (hereinafter “MOIF”) was created to operate apple orchards in the Yakima Valley. It has two general partners— Marley Orchards Corporation and William Gammie. During 1985, the general partners raised 15.7 million dollars by selling limited partnerships in MOIF. 1

The partnership did not achieve the degree of success which…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  2. Arioli v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. Ash v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1992
  4. Fortenberry v. Foxworth Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API