Legal Opinion
Ash v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 1992No. Civ. S-88-0686 DFLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John and Dorris Ash (“the Ashes”) sue Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”) for the acts of William Baxter, a Dean Witter broker. According to the complaint, Baxter advised the Ashes to invest in a tax shelter without informing them that the investment had not been approved by Dean Witter. The Ashes incurred various losses when the IRS disallowed certain deductions. Dean Witter now moves for summary judgment on the ground that the Ashes’ federal securities claims are barred by the statute of limitations. 1 In making this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fortenberry v. Foxworth Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993
- Roeder v. Collection Bureau Of The Hudson Valley, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021