Legal Opinion

Burgin v. Godwin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1942No. 5494PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKES, Justice.

This suit was filed by the appellees, L. B. Godwin, F. P. Works, and James W. Bassett, attorneys at law, the latter two being partners practising under the firm name of Works & Bassett, against the appellants, Fred Burgin and his wife, Ada Burgin. The purpose of the suit was to recover and have partitioned to them a one-fourth interest in 427.9 acres of land together with a like proportion of $1,283.70' in money on deposit in the State National Bank of Groom. Appellees’ suit was based upon a written contract entered into between them and the appellant, Fred Bur-gin, on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. American National Insurance v. WarnockTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Callahan v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. McGaughey v. American Nat. Bank of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cowden v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Perez v. Kirk & Carrigan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  3. Duke v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Collier Manufacturing & Supply, Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Austin, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. James v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API