Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Eberhart

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1996No. 95-BG-292, 95-BG-384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us on the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) that respondent be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a). That statutory provision mandates disbarment of an attorney convicted of a crime of moral turpitude. On January 11, 1995, respondent pled guilty to grand larceny by embezzlement, Va.Code §§ 18.2-95 and - 111, and misuse of public funds, Va.Code § 18.2-112.1. Both crimes are felonies. 1 No exceptions to the Board’s report and recommendation have been filed by either respondent or Bar Counsel.

A felony involves moral…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Zoretic v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. In Re SquillacoteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re FerberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re DukerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. In re DaughteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API