Legal Opinion

United States v. Allard

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 23, 1957No. 11969PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted of conspiracy to distill liquor illegally in violation of United States liquor laws. The indictment charged a conspiracy to defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and violation of the following sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939: 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 2810(a), 2833(a), 3321. In this appeal it is argued that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction.

*841A favorite method of attack on convictions in this and similar cases is to use the analogy of the links of a chain. If the chain has a weak link, the argument runs, the whole chain breaks and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Lorenzo Gonzalez, A/K/A "Tito," United States of America v. Modesto Anthony Caba, United States of America v. Raphael VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Richard Caraballo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API