United States v. Richard Caraballo-Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RENDELL, Circuit Judge:
This case is the last in a long line of cases in which the parties and the district courts have had to divine whether, notwithstanding the jury’s guilty verdict, there was sufficient evidence — and whether we would conclude there was sufficient evidence — for the jury to have determined that the defendant knew that the object of the conspiracy in which he participated was a controlled substance, as opposed to some other type of contraband. We say that this case is “the last” because, after considerable thought, we have concluded that, in many of these opinions,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coleman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. Amos Salmon, No. 90-3355, Raymond E. Washington, No. 90-3363, Richard Fitzpatrick, No. 90-3366, John Surratt, No. 90-3438Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Mark IafeliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- United States v. Kareem BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Anthony BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AquartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.