Robbins v. Omnibus Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and the defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.:
The complaint alleges that the defendant owns and operates a horse railroad, consisting of a double track, in and upon. Third street, between Howard and Folsom streets, in the City of San Francisco, and the purpose of. the action is to recover of the defendant five hundred and twenty dollars for “ repaving the space between the rails of defendant’s said railroad, to wit: the space of two thousand feet.” It appears that on Third street the defendant’s road has a single track for a part of the way and a double track for the residue; that the double track is but a…
2Cited by16 opinions
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Stillwell v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Franchise Tax Board v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Huening v. March Fong EuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.