In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Grimble
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCameron, Justice
I. JURISDICTION
This is a review of the recommendations of the Disciplinary Commission of the Arizona Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.R.S.Ct. 46 and 53(e), 17A A.R.S.
II. QUESTIONS
We must answer two questions:
A. Was there an “attorney-client” relationship between Respondent, in his capacity as director of the Arizona Drug Control District, and Pima County, his employer?
B. Was there sufficient evidence to find that Respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility?1
III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1981, the news media reported that Respondent, L. Terry Grimble, Director…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, LurieArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Romley v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, GrimbleArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StilwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.