Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 11, 2004No. Misc. Docket AG No. 80, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
On November 12, 2002, the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against respondent Gary E. Davis, charging him with violating Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.15 (Safekeeping property)1 and 8.4(b), (e), *363and (d) (Misconduct).2 Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-752(a), we referred the matter to Judge Julia Weatherly of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County to make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. Judge Weatherly held an evidentiary hearing on May 7, 2003, and concluded that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, LurieArizona Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Tobacco Technology, Inc. v. Taiga International N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.