Legal Opinion
Romley v. Arpaio
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 19, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 01-0013PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether the Maricopa County Sheriff can lawfully eschew the services of the Maricopa County Attorney by directing an administrative employee, who is also a licensed attorney, to represent the Sheriff in proceedings before the Maricopa County Employee Merit System Commission. The Sheriff admits that the legislature has not authorized him to employ counsel in this manner. He contends, however, that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors possesses such authority and has delegated it to him by ratifying Maricopa County Employee Merit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Antone v. GREATER ARIZONA AUTO AUCTION, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. BrnovichDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Salib v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Maricopa County v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Antone v. Greater Arizona Auto Auction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.