Legal Opinion

Hineline v. Stroudsburg Electric Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1989No. 3246PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant, Michael I. Hineline, appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining appellees’ demurrers to four counts contained in appellant’s complaint. This appeal presents the question of whether an at-will employee has raised a cognizable claim for wrongful discharge when he was discharged for dismantling his employer’s allegedly illegal video camera with audio capabilities. We affirm.

From October 1, 1977, to December 17, 1986, appellant was employed by appellee Stroudsburg Electric Supply Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Stroudsburg Electric”). Stroudsburg Electric operated…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Reuther v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. John Novosel v. Nationwide Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Yetterant v. Ward Trucking Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. LaRochelle v. Wilmac Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API