Legal Opinion

LaRochelle v. Wilmac Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION 12-CV-5567PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Stengel, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs, Mary LaRochelle, Sandra Riker, Emilia Shearer, Candice Galbreath, and Nicole Vasquez brought this employment discrimination action against Lancashire Hall, Wilmac Corporation, Wilmac Health Care, Inc., and McWil Group Limited (collectively “Defendants”). The plaintiffs were formerly employed at Lancashire Hall, a nursing home, as Certified Nurse Assistants (“CNA”). The plaintiffs bring claims under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (“Section 1981”), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), the Americans with…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ellingsworth v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Gavurnik v. Home Properties, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Gunn v. On the Border Acquisitions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Mahan v. City of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Cartagena v. Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API