Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Paris v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1928No. 3585. [fn*]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLett, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The two points on appeal, presented respectively by the bank and Mrs. P. K. Wallace, are: (1) Whether the rule in Shelley’s Case applies to the portion of the will devising the 181.7 acres of land in controversy;' and (2) whether Mrs. P. K. Wallace and her husband had a homestead interest in the land at the time the deed of trust thereon was executed. It is uniformly conceded’ that the rule in Shelley’s Case is a rule, not of construction, but distinctly of law and property. 24 R. C. L. p. 905; 2 Alexander on Wills, § 901. Such rule forms no part of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hudgins v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Simonton v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Allen v. CraftIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Seay v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1909

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. First National Bank of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Blanks v. First Nat. Bank of SeymourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Lubbock Nat. Bank v. NickelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. First Nat. Bank in Stamford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Dugand v. MagnusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API