First Nat. Bank of Paris v. Wallace
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLett, J.
(after stating the facts as above).
The two points on appeal, presented respectively by the bank and Mrs. P. K. Wallace, are: (1) Whether the rule in Shelley’s Case applies to the portion of the will devising the 181.7 acres of land in controversy;' and (2) whether Mrs. P. K. Wallace and her husband had a homestead interest in the land at the time the deed of trust thereon was executed. It is uniformly conceded’ that the rule in Shelley’s Case is a rule, not of construction, but distinctly of law and property. 24 R. C. L. p. 905; 2 Alexander on Wills, § 901. Such rule forms no part of the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Hudgins v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Simonton v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Allen v. CraftIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Seay v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1909
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wallace v. First National Bank of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Blanks v. First Nat. Bank of SeymourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Lubbock Nat. Bank v. NickelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- First Nat. Bank in Stamford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Dugand v. MagnusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.