Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank in Stamford v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1933No. 1113PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant sued appellee on two promissory notes aggregating approximately $5,000, besides interest and attorneys’ fees, and caused a writ of attachment to issue and be levied on a tract of 175 ½ acres of land in Jones county, which attachment lien was sought to be foreclosed. The defense was that the land upon which the attachment was levied was the homestead of the defendant and not therefore subject to attachment. No issue of fact was raised by the evidence as to ap-pellee’s liability on the notes. On the homestead question the court in his main charge, after…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wallace v. First National Bank of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hatchett v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. American National Bank v. CrugerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Davis v. LundTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McMullan v. San Antonio Joint Stock Land Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Stevenson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. WeatherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Cooper Co. v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Alford v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API