Legal Opinion

Seay v. Cockrell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1909No. 1924PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gaines

Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth Supreme Judicial District. The statement and questions are as follows:

“This suit was brought by appellees against appellant to enforce a contract of sale of a certain lot in the city of Dallas, on which is situated a five-story brick building, known as the ‘Cockrell Building.’
“Defendant admitted to making the contract, but contested plaintiffs’ right to convey a fee simple title to an undivided one-half interest to said property.
“A trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs and the cause is now pending here for review.
“The case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Simonton v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lacey v. FloydTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Henderson v. HarnessIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Davis v. First National Bank of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Frame v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Calvery v. CalveryTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Federal Land Bank v. LittleTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. O'Connor v. ThetfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API