Legal Opinion

City of Barling v. Fort Chaffee Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 2001No. 01-531PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T OM GLAZE, Justice.

In this appeal, arising from a dispute between the City of Barling and the Fort Chaffee Redevelopment Authority, we are asked to resolve the question of who has the authority to designate the use of 7,390 acres that were formerly a part of Fort Chaffee, but which Barling annexed in a series of three elections in 1981, 1982, and 1991. Before proceeding to the legal issues presented by the appeal, a brief recitation of the facts of Fort Chaffee’s history is necessary.

In 1941, the United States Department of the Army purchased over 76,000 acres in Sebastian County for the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of WynneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Bolden v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Arlington Hotel Co. v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Barclay v. First Paris Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brock v. TownsellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. First United Bank v. Phase II, Edgewater Addition Residential Property Owners Improvements District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Stephens v. PetrinoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Monday v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Jackson v. IvorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API