Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bound

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 13, 1952No. 201PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*225Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:'

I

The accused, Bound, a hospital apprentice, United States Navy, was charged with a violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 715. The specification alleged the wrongful appropriation of a Chevrolet automobile, the property of a Marine corporal stationed at the accused’s base. Upon trial by special court-martial at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, the accused pleaded guilty to the charge and specification, and after being properly instructed regarding the effect thereof persisted in the plea. He was convicted of the offense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  3. Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
  4. United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. Newman v. Newman (In Re Newman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. SchullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. McCluskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API