Legal Opinion

Barr v. Kamo Elec. Corp., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1983No. WD 33279PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Judge.

Plaintiffs sue for damages to land resulting from the erection of a power line by KAMO Electric Corporation, Inc., (“KAMO”). 1 Plaintiffs prayed for compensatory and punitive damages. The court directed a verdict for KAMO on the issue of punitive damages, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $7,500 compensatory damages. Both parties appealed, but plaintiffs have abandoned their appeal, so that the only matters now before this court for decision are the issues presented by KAMO on its appeal.

In 1976, KAMO erected a power line pursuant to condemnation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. May v. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Loumar Development Co. v. RedelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Stewart v. City of MarshfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Turner v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Langenberg v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moore Automotive Group, Inc. v. GoffsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Owen v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Rose v. City of RiversideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Modern Tractor & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. George Ward Builders, Inc. v. City of Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API