Legal Opinion

Langenberg v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 14, 1946No. 39842PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing an action for $50,000 damages for alleged unlawful deprivation of the use and enjoyment of lands.

The principal question presented is whether plaintiff's fourth amended petition states a claim upon which relief can be granted; and, should this court rule the petition is in such respect insufficient, then a further question is presented — did the trial court err in rendering judgment of dismissal without permitting plaintiff to further amend. It is contended by plaintiff that the trial court acted arbitrarily and in violation of the Civil Code…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chambers v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. Gerber v. Schutte Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Pitzman v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Soulard v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  5. Riggs v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. State Ex Rel. McClure v. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Berkowski v. St. Louis County Board of Election CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Therrien v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Holtz v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API