Legal Opinion

Stewart v. City of Marshfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1968No. 8627PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

In this “action for damages to land by reason of permanent nuisance” (as plaintiffs’-appellants’ counsel characterize and classify it in the first sentence of their brief), plaintiffs Charles and Joan Stewart, husband and wife, obtained on June 23,1966, a ten-member jury verdict for $2,500 upon which judgment then was entered. (All emphasis herein is ours.) In response to the timely after-trial motion of defendant City of Marshfield, Missouri, the trial court entered an order on August 29, 1966, sustaining that motion and granting a new trial to defendant on the specified ground…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Brown v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District of Holt CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Owen v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Byrom v. Little Blue Valley Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Brittain v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API