State v. Lakin
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
In this case the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the trial court should have sustained a defense motion to suppress evidence. Acting without a warrant, sheriffs’ officers seized cultivated marijuana after a search of respondent’s farm. We granted the State’s petition to give further consideration to the issues raised.
The facts as developed at an informal suppression hearing are summarized in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals as follows:
“The farm itself is located in Hancock County, but the tip which led officers to the property was first communicated to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. JacuminTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. VineyardTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BerriosTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.