Legal Opinion
State v. Berrios
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 2007No. W2005-01179-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · WadeGary R. Wade, J.
in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, C.J., and JANICE M. HOLDER and CORNELIA A. CLARK, JJ., joined.
The defendant, Eric Berrios, was charged with one count of possession with intent to sell or deliver more than three hundred grams of cocaine. After the trial court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress the cocaine seized during the traffic stop, the State was granted an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 9 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the suppression of the evidence. We granted the State’s application for permission to appeal to…
3Cases cited48 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by89 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher Lee DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GilleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.