Legal Opinion

State v. Vineyard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1997No. 03S01-9612-CR-00120PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether under Article I, Section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution a stop based upon probable cause is valid irrespective of the subjective motivations of the police officer making the stop. The defendant concedes that under the Fourth Amendment to the federal constitution, the subjective motivations of police officers are irrelevant so long as the stop is otherwise based upon probable cause. 1 However, the defendant asks us to hold that, in this context, the Tennessee Constitution’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. State v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API