Legal Opinion

Conden v. Morningstar

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1884No. 11,126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This was an action by the appellee Sarah C. Morningstar against the appellant and the appellee John C. Comer, sheriff, who declines to join in the appeal, to recover the possession of personal property. The issues were tried by a jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff. The appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, an exception reserved, and judgment rendered upon the verdict. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is assigned for error. The consideration of the case will be confined to such points of alleged error as are discussed in the appellant’s brief.

Complaint is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Drinkout v. Eagle Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. First National Bank of Cambridge City v. ColterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Farman v. LaumanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Shorb v. KinzieIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pedigo v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Fowler v. NewsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hedrick v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Joseph v. MatherIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bauer v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API