Hedrick v. D. M. Osborne & Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vermillion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J. —
The complaint of the appellee alleges that it is a corporation organized under the laws of New York; that one Thompson Roe instituted proceedings in attachment .against it, and that the bond filed in the proceedings was signed by the appellant as a surety. It is not directly alleged that a writ of attachment was issued, but it is alleged *144that “ in obedience to the writ of attachment issued in said cause, the sheriff levied upon and attached the property of the plaintiff.”
The complaint was not questioned in the court below in any form, but is here assailed by the assignment of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago R. R. v. CollingwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kempf v. HimselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Pedigo v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Steinke v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Carter v. RichartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.