Farman v. Lauman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— This was an action by husband and wife, Charles A. Lauman and Mary J. Lauman, to recover for personal injury to the latter, alleged to have been inflicted upon her by the appellant. The complaint is in three paragraphs :
The first charges an assault and battery.
The second and third charge false imprisonment.
A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment against «appellant for five hundred dollars. The assignment of errors is upon the motion denying appellant a new trial.
Mary J. Lauman was permitted to testify as a witness, ;and of this ruling appellant complains, but his complaint is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. MyrtleIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Kinnaman v. KinnamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Garner v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Bennifield v. HypresIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Lauter v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Kelley v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Whitney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.