Legal Opinion

Estate of Price

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1942No. Civ. 12273PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

To a petition for distribution filed by the executor objections were filed by two children of a deceased son of the testatrix upon the grounds that they had been unintentionally omitted from the provisions of the will. Following a hearing the probate court decreed that they were entitled to their proportionate share of the estate under section 90 of the Probate Code. The executor and a brother who was mentioned in the will appeal from this decree.

Eva L. Price died testate on June 4, 1941, leaving as her only heirs at law her two sons and two grandchildren, Merton Joseph Price, born August 3,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re Estate of HassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In Re Estate of SankeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Estate of LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Estate of MinearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Van Strien v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Estate of CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API