Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Minear

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1919No. L. A. No. 6032PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Ernest F. Baker, William Weinstein and Jacob Weinberger for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

The decedent in this case died, leaving a will disposing of all of his estate to parties other than the appellants. The latter claim to be children of the testator and that they are entitled as such to inherit in spite of the will under section 1307 of the Civil Code, which provides that “When any testator omits to provide in his will for any of his children, or for the issue of any deceased child, unless it appears that such omission was intentional, such child, or the issue of such child, has the same share in the estate of the testator as if he had died intestate, and succeeds thereto as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Van Strien v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Estate of CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API