Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hassell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1914No. S.F. No. 7026PublishedCited by 39 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Nils F. Hassell died testate. His estate was probated in the county of Alameda. He was seventy-nine years old at the time of his death. The executor petitioned for final distribution of his estate. Three of the children of Hassell petitioned for distributive shares of the estate as pretermitted heirs of the deceased. The court held that they were not pretermitted heirs, but had been intentionally omitted from any share in the testator’s bounty. Prom the decree following this determination these children of Nils F. Hassell have appealed.

The will contained the following provisions:

“One-half…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Rhoton v. BlevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re Estate of SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Spaniard v. TantomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Estate of PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Estate of LindsayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API