Mut. Holding Co. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 59.] MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. LIMBACH, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. [Cite as Mut. Holding Co. v. Limbach,
1994-Ohio-30.] Taxation—Franchise tax—Noninsurance corporation that is a subsidiary of a domestic insurance company is not exempt under R.C. 5725.25 from franchise tax imposed by R.C. 5725.18. (No. 93-1167—Submitted September 20, 1994—Decided November 30, 1994.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 90-H-1058, 91-B-155, 91-F-156 and 91-D-157. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellee, Mutual Holding Company…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celina Mutual Ins. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Mutual Holding Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Bank One Dayton, N.A. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hoover Universal, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- International Harvester Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ohio Grocers Assn. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Fifth Third Bank v. SenviskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ohio Grocers Assn. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Yonkov v. Maximus Holding Group LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024