Legal Opinion

Mutual Holding Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1994No. 93-1167PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

By this appeal we are asked to determine whether a wholly owned noninsurance subsidiary of a domestic insurance company is exempt under R.C. 5725.25 from paying franchise tax if the parent pays the franchise tax on domestic insurance companies imposed by R.C. 5725.18. We hold that a noninsurance corporation that is a subsidiary of a domestic insurance company is not exempt under R.C. 5725.25 from the franchise tax imposed by R.C. Chapter 5733.

*60R.C. 5725.25 is an exemption statute which must be strictly construed against the taxpayer. Celina Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bowers (1965), 5 Ohio St.2d 12, 34…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Celina Mutual Ins. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bank One Dayton, N.A. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hoover Universal, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. International Harvester Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ohio Grocers Assn. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Advanced Analytics Laboratories, Inc. v. Environmental Aspecs, Inc. (In Re Environmental Aspecs, Inc.)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999
  4. Fifth Third Bank v. SenviskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API