Mutual Holding Co. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
By this appeal we are asked to determine whether a wholly owned noninsurance subsidiary of a domestic insurance company is exempt under R.C. 5725.25 from paying franchise tax if the parent pays the franchise tax on domestic insurance companies imposed by R.C. 5725.18. We hold that a noninsurance corporation that is a subsidiary of a domestic insurance company is not exempt under R.C. 5725.25 from the franchise tax imposed by R.C. Chapter 5733.
*60R.C. 5725.25 is an exemption statute which must be strictly construed against the taxpayer. Celina Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bowers (1965), 5 Ohio St.2d 12, 34…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Celina Mutual Ins. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Bank One Dayton, N.A. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hoover Universal, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- International Harvester Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ohio Grocers Assn. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Advanced Analytics Laboratories, Inc. v. Environmental Aspecs, Inc. (In Re Environmental Aspecs, Inc.)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Fifth Third Bank v. SenviskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.