Legal Opinion

Celina Mutual Ins. v. Bowers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1965No. Nos. 39142 and 39143PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

In support of their position and the favorable judgments of the Court of Appeals, appellees rely on Section 5725.25, Eevised Code, first effective in 1931 and which has remained in substantially the same form ever since. That section, as applicable and pertinent, reads:

‘ ‘ The real estate of a domestic insurance company shall be taxed in the place where it is located, the same as the real estate of other persons is taxed, but the tax provided for by Sections 5725.01 to 5725.26, inclusive, of the Eevised Code, shall be in lieu of all other taxes on the other property and assets of such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Oxford v. Housing Authority of City of BarnesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Birmingham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Colorado Department of Revenue v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Central Credit Union of Maryland v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. General Motors Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API