Legal Opinion
Taos Construction Co. v. Penzel Construction Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1988No. 53221PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Presiding Judge.
Both parties appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant Penzel Construction Company on plaintiff Taos Construction Company’s breach of contract claim and in favor of Taos on Penzel’s counterclaim. The appeals are consolidated for our review; we affirm.
Penzel was the prime contractor for a Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission project that involved the construction of four bridges on Highway 106 in Shannon County for a total contract price of about $1.25 million. The contract allowed Penzel 120 working days in which to complete the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dave Gustafson & Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Grand Bissell Towers, Inc. v. Joan Gagnon Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Southwest Engineering Company, a Missouri Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Paragon Group, Inc. v. AmplemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Anthony Arcese v. Daniel Schmitt & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hawkins v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Information Systems and Networks Corporation v. City of Kansas City, MoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.