Legal Opinion
Anthony Arcese v. Daniel Schmitt & Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 6, 2016No. ED103087PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLisa P. Page, Judge
Anthony Arcese' (“Plaintiff’) filed suit against Daniel Schmitt & Co. (“Defendant”) alleging, inter alia, violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (“MMPA”), Section 407.010, et seq., in connection with the sale of a 1954 Cadillac convertible. In response thereto, Defendant filed a counterclaim for breach of contract. After a bench trial, judgment was entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
BACKGROUND
In December 2010, with the assistance of his adult children, Plaintiff, a New York resident,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- King v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Selleck v. Keith M. Evans Insurance, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Davis v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- ADB Companies, Inc. v. Socket Telecom, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Amalaco, LLC, d/b/a MJM Renovation v. Christy Butero and Brian HouselyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.