Legal Opinion
City of Clifton v. Weber
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 26, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 N.J. Super. 333 (1964)
202 A.2d 186
CITY OF CLIFTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DONALD P. WEBER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 2, 1964.
Decided June 26, 1964.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and FULOP.
Mr. David B. Buerger of the Pennsylvania Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., of counsel).
Mr. Nicholas G. Mandak, First Legal Assistant, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Sam Monchak, City Counsel, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by LEWIS,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Moyant v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Bonito v. BLOOMFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- City of Clifton v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Tp. of Little Falls v. HusniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. PumaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.