Legal Opinion
City of Clifton v. Weber
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 22, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee Curiam.
The Appellate Division affirmed a conviction for violation of a municipal ordinance, City of Clifton v. Weber, 84 N. J. Super. 333 (1964), and one judge dissenting, the defendant prosecuted this appeal to us. R. R. 1:2-1 (b).
The ordinance regulates house-to-house soliciting or canvassing. Defendant charged the ordinance imposes an unconstitutional burden upon interstate commerce.
It developed at the argument before us that the attack upon the ordinance was prompted by an assumption that the ordinance applied notwithstanding that the householder…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Clifton v. WeberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mogolefsky v. SchoemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Bonito v. BLOOMFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Tp. of Little Falls v. HusniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. PumaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.