Legal Opinion

Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Portland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1925No. 417PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Appellant is an Illinois corporation engaged in manufacturing silk hosiery at Indianapolis, Ind., and selling it throughout the United States to consumers only. It employs duly accredited representatives in many States who go from house to house soliciting and accepting orders. When a willing purchaser is found the solicitor fills out arid signs in duplicate a so-called “ order blank.” This obligates appellant to make delivery of the specified goods and, among other things, states—

“ The mills require a deposit of $1.00 [or other specified sum] on each box listed below. Your hosiery will be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Shafer v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API